- About Us
- Franchise Law
- Business Disputes
- Our Important Court Cases
- What’s New
Authors: Evan Ivkovic and Jeff Nguyen, Students-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka The Court of Appeal for Ontario released an important franchise decision last week in the case of Mendoza v Active Tire & Auto Inc., 2017 ONCA 471, in which it clarified the legal test to apply in franchise rescission cases under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, SO 2000, c 3 (the “Act”). Active Tire & Auto Inc.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, originally appears in the May 31, 2017, issue of The Lawyers Daily. Click here to view the full article.
By Ben Hanuka This decision of the Court of Appeal from September 2016, dealt with a motion by General Motors of Canada Ltd.