Leading Canadian
FRANCHISE & BUSINESS LAW FIRM

341 Pizza (Bekah)

Full Case Name: Bekah v. Three for One Pizza (2003)

This court decision was among the earliest reported franchise disclosure decisions after the passage of Ontario’s franchise legislation, the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000.

It was the first Ontario decision that defined the term “franchise agreement” under the Act to include an agreement of purchase and sale.

The franchisor required that the franchisee purchase the store through a conventional purchase and sale agreement before entering into a franchise agreement. By structuring the transaction this way, the franchisor attempted to circumvent the disclosure requirements that the Act imposes on franchisors.

After the parties signed the purchase and sale agreement – before the purchase transaction closed and before the full franchise agreement was signed – the purchaser discovered problems with the franchise. He asked to cancel (rescind) the purchase and get his purchase money back.

The franchisor objected and took the position that the buyer was required to first close the purchase transaction, sign the franchise agreement, and only then attempt to rescind the purchase.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice agreed with the purchaser. It held that the purchase and sale agreement was a “franchise agreement” under the meaning of the Act, and that the purchaser was entitled to rescind the purchase without having to close the transaction and without signing the full franchise agreement.

This court decision was very influential in the early years of the development of franchise disclosure law in Ontario. The case had a significant impact on how franchise lawyers and franchisors structured sale and resale transactions – by making sure that franchisors provide a fulsome disclosure package before the parties sign any binding agreement relating to the sale, even an agreement of purchase and sale.

Back

Franchise Law Blog

Franchise Renewals: Introducing...

Posted by | 15 August 2017

​This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyers Daily on July 7, 2017, under the title “Courts struggle for balance with material changes to... Read More

Court of Appeal for Ontario Provides...

Posted by | 14 June 2017

Authors: Evan Ivkovic and Jeff Nguyen, Students-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Read More

Franchise-Lease Disclosure Problems...

Posted by | 25 May 2017

This article, written by Ben Hanuka, originally appears in the May 31, 2017, issue of The Lawyers Daily. Click here to view the full article. Read More

View All

What’s New

​​Article in The Lawyers D...

We are pleased to announce that The Lawyers Daily published an article by Ben Hanuka on July 7, 2017, titled “Courts struggle for balance with material changes to renewal... Read More

Ben Hanuka quoted in Lawyers D...

We are pleased to announce that both of the top legal news publications in Canada - The Lawyers Daily and Law Times – reported about the recent Ontario Court of Appeal... Read More

Law Works Expanding to British...

We are pleased to announce that on June 2, 2017, Ben Hanuka was called (admitted) to the British Columbia Bar at an official Call to the Bar ceremony of the Law Society and... Read More

View All

Request Information

Please select the CIRCLE and click the SUBMIT button

 Please wait...