By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. v. Mang, a May 14, 2021, decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the court struck a few paragraphs from the defence (Response to Civil Claim) of the self-represented defendants, who were former Shoppers Drug Mart franchisees in Vancouver and Powell River. Some of the paragraphs that the court struck contained scandalous allegations, such as allegations of gossip, bullying, and evidence about irrelevant facts; other allegations did not advance the defence.
By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In Unicity Holdings Ltd. v. Great British Vape Co.
By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In 9925350 Canada Inc. v. Kevito Ltd.
By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In a May 31, 2021, decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Coffee Time Donuts v 2197938 Ontario...
By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In Wheatberries Bakery Ltd.
By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 10001325 Canada Inc. v. Cacao 70 Inc.
By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 1777453 Alberta Ltd. v. Got Mold Disaster Recovery Services Inc.
By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc.
By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In Spina v. Shoppers Drug Mart Inc.
*Law Works is a Canadian law firm. It publishes a newsletter to inform subscribers about franchise disputes. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the ‘unsubscribe’ link in our emails.
