- About Us
- Franchise Law
- Business Disputes
- Our Important Court Cases
- What’s New
Author: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 2352392 Ontario Inc. v. Msi, a March 20, 2020, decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, the court held that a franchisee’s pleading that it served on the franchisor qualified as a notice of rescission under section 6(3) of the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000. Key Facts RBC claimed against the franchisee for payment on a bank loan that was used to finance the purchase of the franchised restaurant.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In New Vision Renaissance MX Ltd. v. The Symposium Café Inc.
By Ben Hanuka With the unfolding crisis, the commercial Bar across Canada is naturally dealing with contractual and common law...
In this short introductory video, Ben Hanuka discusses a franchise operating manual, the contents of the manual, and potential friction between the...
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on November 13, 2019, under the same title.