By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In Tiny Hoppers Corp. v. 2402074 Ontario Inc., an April 28, 2020, decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the court dismissed the plaintiff franchisor’s action for repayment of amounts that it had paid under a settlement to the defendant franchisees. The franchisor alleged that the franchisees breached their de-branding and non-disparagement obligations. Key facts Tiny Hoppers is the franchisor of a system of daycares.
In 1384334 Alberta Ltd v Buster's Pizza Donair & Pasta Enterprises Ltd.
This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on June 18, 2020, under the same title.
By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 2483038 Ontario Inc. v. 2082100 Ontario Inc.
This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on May 14, 2020, under the same title.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 2352392 Ontario Inc. v.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In New Vision Renaissance MX Ltd. v. The Symposium Café Inc.
This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on March 13, 2020, under the same title.
This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on April 6, 2020, under the same title.
*Law Works is a Canadian law firm. It publishes a newsletter to inform subscribers about franchise and arbitration disputes. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the ‘unsubscribe’ link in our emails.
