This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on May 14, 2020, under the same title. The assistance of Anthony Pugh, Associate at Law Works PC, in writing this article is acknowledged with thanks. This article provides an outline of frequently claimed substantive franchise causes of action under common law. (Two earlier articles in this series addressed procedural issues in franchise litigation and substantive causes of action that are statute-based.
Author: Anthony Pugh and Sarah McMahon, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In 2462192 Ontario Ltd. v.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Najah c.
Authors: Ben Hanuka and Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. 2018 was a busy year in Canadian franchise disputes.
In this video, Ben Hanuka outlines the key points from the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Payette v.
Published in the Huffington Post on August 27, 2013.
*Law Works is a Canadian law firm. It publishes a newsletter to inform subscribers about franchise and arbitration disputes. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the ‘unsubscribe’ link in our emails.
