- About Us
- Franchise Law
- Business Disputes
- Our Important Court Cases
- What’s New
Author: Anthony Pugh, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Diduck v. Simpson, a May 10, 2018, decision of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench, the court dismissed the plaintiff distributor’s summary judgment motion for franchise rescission on the basis that he had not established a prima facie case that the distributor agreement was a franchise agreement within the meaning of Manitoba’s franchise legislation, The Franchises Act.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily February 8, 2018. Click here to view the published article.
By Ben Hanuka This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily on January 31, 2018.
In an earlier article posted on the Law Works Franchise Blog on July 27, 2014,Seven Tips for (Experienced) Franchisees When Buying a Franchise, I...
If you are an experienced franchisee looking to purchase a franchised business, chances are that, this time around, you are looking to engage in...