By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In Tiny Hoppers Corp. v. 2402074 Ontario Inc., an April 28, 2020, decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the court dismissed the plaintiff franchisor’s action for repayment of amounts that it had paid under a settlement to the defendant franchisees. The franchisor alleged that the franchisees breached their de-branding and non-disparagement obligations. Key facts Tiny Hoppers is the franchisor of a system of daycares.
This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on June 18, 2020, under the same title.
This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on May 14, 2020, under the same title.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Modern Cleaning Concept Inc. v.
Authors: Ben Hanuka and Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. In 1777453 Alberta Ltd. v. Got Mold Disaster Recovery Services Inc.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In 2355305 Ontario Inc. v. Savannah Wells Holdings Inc.
Author: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. Overview In Westeinde (FNP) Inc. v. RE/MAX Core Realty Inc.
Authors: Ben Hanuka and Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. 2018 was a busy year in Canadian franchise disputes.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In 526901 B.C. Ltd. v. Dairy Queen Canada Inc.
*Law Works is a Canadian law firm. It publishes a newsletter to inform subscribers about franchise and arbitration disputes. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the ‘unsubscribe’ link in our emails.
