This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on May 14, 2020, under the same title. The assistance of Anthony Pugh, Associate at Law Works PC, in writing this article is acknowledged with thanks. This article provides an outline of frequently claimed substantive franchise causes of action under common law. (Two earlier articles in this series addressed procedural issues in franchise litigation and substantive causes of action that are statute-based.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Modern Cleaning Concept Inc. v.
Authors: Ben Hanuka and Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. In 1777453 Alberta Ltd. v. Got Mold Disaster Recovery Services Inc.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In 2355305 Ontario Inc. v. Savannah Wells Holdings Inc.
Author: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. Overview In Westeinde (FNP) Inc. v. RE/MAX Core Realty Inc.
Authors: Ben Hanuka and Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. 2018 was a busy year in Canadian franchise disputes.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In 526901 B.C. Ltd. v. Dairy Queen Canada Inc.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Sopropharm c. Jean-Coutu Group (PJC) Inc.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In 1523428 Ontario Inc./JB&M Walker Ltd. v.
*Law Works is a Canadian law firm. It publishes a newsletter to inform subscribers about franchise and arbitration disputes. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the ‘unsubscribe’ link in our emails.
