Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Fyfe v. Stephens, an August 3, 2018, decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the court granted partial summary judgment to a licensee for rescission of an Exclusivity Agreement on the basis that it was a “franchise agreement” under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 (“the Act”).
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily June 15, 2018. Click here to view the published article.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In franchise resales, i.e.
Author: Evan Ivkovic, J.D., Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In Hepburn v AlarmForce Industries Inc.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer's Daily on July 7, 2017, under the title “Courts struggle for...
Note: This article, authored by Ben Hanuka, was published earlier this month in the US-based Hotel Business Review.
What happens when the franchisor wants to implement a change to the franchise system, yet the franchise agreement does not contain some system...