In 1384334 Alberta Ltd v Buster's Pizza Donair & Pasta Enterprises Ltd., a June 16, 2020, the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta found that the parties had never agreed on the essential terms of a franchise agreement. As a result, the court denied the plaintiffs’ claim for net losses under Alberta’s Franchises Act and unjust enrichment claim. But it allowed their claim for damages for conversion of leased equipment which two of the defendants sold to a third party.
By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 2483038 Ontario Inc. v. 2082100 Ontario Inc.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on September 20, 2019, under the title, “Start your engines:...
Authors: Ben Hanuka and Anthony Pugh, Law Works P.C.
Authors: Ben Hanuka and Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. 2018 was a busy year in Canadian franchise disputes.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Second Cup Ltd. c. 8702934 Canada Inc.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily February 8, 2018. Click here to view the published article.
By Ben Hanuka This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily on January 31, 2018.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, originally appears in the March 31, 2017, issue of The Lawyers Weekly. Click here to view the full article.
*Law Works is a Canadian law firm. It publishes a newsletter to inform subscribers about franchise and arbitration disputes. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the ‘unsubscribe’ link in our emails.
