This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily February 8, 2018. Click here to view the published article. By Ben Hanuka Are the key reasons in this decision similar to and different from the “material fact” definition in the Act? As elaborated in the first part of this article, the Court of Appeal for Ontario held that disclosure deficiencies justify rescission under subsection 6(2) of the Act if the franchisee cannot “make a properly informed decision on whether to invest in the franchise.
By Ben Hanuka This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily on January 31, 2018.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, originally appears in the March 31, 2017, issue of The Lawyers Weekly. Click here to view the full article.
Author: Gleb Matushansky, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editorial Committee: Law Works P.C.
In the decision of Raibex Canada Ltd. v ASWR Franchising Corp.