Author: Anthony Pugh, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Diduck v. Simpson, a May 10, 2018, decision of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench, the court dismissed the plaintiff distributor’s summary judgment motion for franchise rescission on the basis that he had not established a prima facie case that the distributor agreement was a franchise agreement within the meaning of Manitoba’s franchise legislation, The Franchises Act.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In 1680960 Ontario Inc. v.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In Giroux et al. v.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily February 8, 2018. Click here to view the published article.
By Ben Hanuka This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily on January 31, 2018.
By Ben Hanuka This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily on December 6, 2017.
Author: Anthony Pugh, J.D., Law Works P.C.
Author: Evan Ivkovic, J.D., Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In Hepburn v AlarmForce Industries Inc.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily on October 11, 2017, under the title, “The Reality of...