Leading Canadian
FRANCHISE & BUSINESS LAW FIRM

Quiznos (Site Selection Class Action)

Full Case Name: Al-Harazi v. Quizno’s Canada Restaurant Corporation (2007)

This was the first Ontario class action based on the disclosure requirements in the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000.

The class was comprised of about 200 franchisees. Each of them entered into a franchise agreement with Quiznos for a franchised restaurant in Ontario.

None of the approximately 200 franchise agreements resulted in the selection of a restaurant location and construction of a franchised restaurant.

After signing the franchise agreement, each franchisee waited for Quiznos to finalize details about the lease and construction requirements of the location.

The class action sought a refund of the franchise fee on behalf of all 200 class members. Quiznos took the position that, based on the terms the franchise agreement, franchisees were required to finalize leases for their stores on their own.

The class action was framed as a franchise disclosure claim under the Act, rather than as a breach of contract case under the terms of the franchise agreement. The action claimed that Quiznos failed to disclose to franchisees all material information about the leasing and site selection process.

In 2007, the case was settled after an extensive and complex multi-day mediation with a senior judge, at the time Regional Senior Justice Winkler, who later went on to become Chief Justice of Ontario (now retired).

As a class action, the settlement required court approval. After an extensive court hearing, including hearing from various class members, another senior Ontario court judge, Mr. Justice Cullity (now retired), approved the settlement.

The case was extensively covered in the media across Canada, and even in the U.S.

The case had a significant impact in the franchise industry by highlighting to franchisors and their professional advisors the importance of streamlining the site-selection process – both logistically and in the legal disclosure process.

Back

Franchise Law Blog

B.C. Supreme Court dismisses...

Posted by | 1 October 2019

Author: Anthony Pugh and Sarah McMahon, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Cactus World Holdings Ltd. v. Earl’s Holdings Ltd. et al. Read More

Ontario Court dismissed summary...

Posted by | 1 October 2019

Author: Anthony Pugh and Sarah McMahon, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In 2462192 Ontario Ltd. v. Read More

Ontario Court rules that a court...

Posted by | 18 September 2019

Author: Anthony Pugh and Sarah McMahon, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In the case of 2352392 Ontario Inc. et al. v. Vusumzi Msi et al. Read More

View All

What’s New

Ben Hanuka recognized in 2020 ...

We are pleased to announce that Ben Hanuka has been recognized in the 2020 Best Lawyers in Canada peer-rated directory in the Franchise Law category. Read More

Ben Hanuka to co-present at CF...

We are pleased to announce that Ben Hanuka will co-present at the Canadian Franchise Association’s annual Franchise Law Day on September 26, 2019. Read More

Sarah Ellen McMahon Joins Law ...

We are pleased to announce that Sarah Ellen McMahon joined Law Works as articling students as of July 8, 2019. Sarah obtained her J.D. Read More

View All