Leading Canadian
FRANCHISE & BUSINESS LAW FIRM

Quiznos (Site Selection Class Action)

Full Case Name: Al-Harazi v. Quizno’s Canada Restaurant Corporation (2007)

This was the first Ontario class action based on the disclosure requirements in the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000.

The class was comprised of about 200 franchisees. Each of them entered into a franchise agreement with Quiznos for a franchised restaurant in Ontario.

None of the approximately 200 franchise agreements resulted in the selection of a restaurant location and construction of a franchised restaurant.

After signing the franchise agreement, each franchisee waited for Quiznos to finalize details about the lease and construction requirements of the location.

The class action sought a refund of the franchise fee on behalf of all 200 class members. Quiznos took the position that, based on the terms the franchise agreement, franchisees were required to finalize leases for their stores on their own.

The class action was framed as a franchise disclosure claim under the Act, rather than as a breach of contract case under the terms of the franchise agreement. The action claimed that Quiznos failed to disclose to franchisees all material information about the leasing and site selection process.

In 2007, the case was settled after an extensive and complex multi-day mediation with a senior judge, at the time Regional Senior Justice Winkler, who later went on to become Chief Justice of Ontario (now retired).

As a class action, the settlement required court approval. After an extensive court hearing, including hearing from various class members, another senior Ontario court judge, Mr. Justice Cullity (now retired), approved the settlement.

The case was extensively covered in the media across Canada, and even in the U.S.

The case had a significant impact in the franchise industry by highlighting to franchisors and their professional advisors the importance of streamlining the site-selection process – both logistically and in the legal disclosure process.

Back

Franchise Law Blog

Ontario Court Dismisses Bulk of...

Posted by | 27 August 2020

By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works  Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works  In Spina v. Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. Read More

Franchise Independent Legal Advice...

Posted by | 27 August 2020

This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily as a two-part series on August 20, 2020 and August 24, 2020. Read More

Nova Scotia Court Grants Second Cup’s...

Posted by | 27 August 2020

By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works  In Second Cup Ltd. v. OPB Realty Inc. Read More

View All

What’s New

Ben Hanuka Recognized in the 2...

We are pleased to announce that Ben Hanuka has been peer-selected for inclusion in the 2021 edition of The Best Lawyers™ in Canada directory in the area of Franchise Law. Read More

Franchise Issue in Focus Augus...

The August edition of our Franchise Issue in Focus, a new monthly supplement to our Franchise Law Newsletter, has now been sent out to subscribers of the Franchise Law... Read More

Ben Hanuka to Speak at CFA Fra...

We are pleased to announce that Ben Hanuka will be speaking at the Canadian Franchise Association's 2020 Franchise Law Day on September 24, 2020. Read More

View All