REGISTER FOR OUR NEXT LIVE WEBINAR

Leading Canadian
FRANCHISE & BUSINESS LAW FIRM

Quiznos (Site Selection Class Action)

Full Case Name: Al-Harazi v. Quizno’s Canada Restaurant Corporation (2007)

This was the first Ontario class action based on the disclosure requirements in the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000.

The class was comprised of about 200 franchisees. Each of them entered into a franchise agreement with Quiznos for a franchised restaurant in Ontario.

None of the approximately 200 franchise agreements resulted in the selection of a restaurant location and construction of a franchised restaurant.

After signing the franchise agreement, each franchisee waited for Quiznos to finalize details about the lease and construction requirements of the location.

The class action sought a refund of the franchise fee on behalf of all 200 class members. Quiznos took the position that, based on the terms the franchise agreement, franchisees were required to finalize leases for their stores on their own.

The class action was framed as a franchise disclosure claim under the Act, rather than as a breach of contract case under the terms of the franchise agreement. The action claimed that Quiznos failed to disclose to franchisees all material information about the leasing and site selection process.

In 2007, the case was settled after an extensive and complex multi-day mediation with a senior judge, at the time Regional Senior Justice Winkler, who later went on to become Chief Justice of Ontario (now retired).

As a class action, the settlement required court approval. After an extensive court hearing, including hearing from various class members, another senior Ontario court judge, Mr. Justice Cullity (now retired), approved the settlement.

The case was extensively covered in the media across Canada, and even in the U.S.

The case had a significant impact in the franchise industry by highlighting to franchisors and their professional advisors the importance of streamlining the site-selection process – both logistically and in the legal disclosure process.

Back

Franchise Law Blog

Fix It or Nix It: The 5 Key Elements of...

Posted by | 27 September 2022

Based on recent court decisions, if your FDD does not contain these 5 key elements, it is probably legally void. Read More

Court dismisses non-compete injunction...

Posted by | 14 September 2022

In Revel Realty Inc. v. Costabile et al, a decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released on June 28, 2022, the court dismissed Revel Realty Inc. Read More

Franchise law: Three important appeal...

Posted by | 25 August 2022

This article, written by Ben Hanuka, originally appeared in the August 15, 2022, issue of The Lawyer’s Daily. Read More

View All

What’s New

Ben’s article series in ...

The Lawyer’s Daily published a three-part series of articles written by Ben Hanuka, with the assistance of Anthony Pugh, associate at Law Works, titled “Franchise... Read More

July Franchise Law Newsletter:...

The July 2022 issue of our Franchise Law newsletter features articles about three recent decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario. Read More

Law Works webinar on Franchise...

We are pleased to announce that our upcoming 90-minute live webinar "Advising About Franchise Rescission Rights – Lawyers’ Obligations" has been accredited by the Law... Read More

View All