Leading Canadian
FRANCHISE & BUSINESS LAW FIRM

Sovereignty (Houston Stakes)

Full Case Name: Sovereignty Investment Holdings, Inc. v. 9127-6907 Quebec Inc. (2008)

This is an influential Ontario court decision under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, on the issue of what constitutes a materially deficient disclosure document.

The franchisee purchased a large restaurant in the Vaughan-Mills Shopping Centre that is located in Vaughan. The franchisor was a Quebec franchise startup.

About a year after purchasing the restaurant, the franchisee was forced to close it down as a result of mounting losses.

The disclosure document did not contain key required components under the Act. The franchisee brought a court action to cancel (rescind) the franchise purchase and receive compensation.

The court held for the first time that a disclosure document is inoperable and is not considered a “disclosure document” under the Act if it fails to contain any one of the following fundamental components: (i) a signed franchisor’s certificate, (ii) financial statements, (iii) if earning projections are included, the required supporting information about, and (iv) that the disclosure document contain all required information and documents in one document, delivered to a prospective franchisee at one time.

The decision was made by a senior judge of the Ontario court, sitting on the specialized Commercial List, Mr. Justice Wilton-Siegel.

This case has played a pivotal role in shaping some fundamental aspects of Ontario franchise disclosure law under the Act with respect to the main requirements of a disclosure document under the Act.

In addition, this was the first Ontario case that held a successor franchisor – a purchasing franchisor that acquired the rights to the franchise system from the original franchisor – was liable to a franchisee for the original franchisor’s rescission obligations.

Back

Franchise Law Blog

Ontario Court of Appeal in Lettieri...

Posted by | 16 November 2017

Author: Anthony Pugh, J.D., Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka On October 25, 2017, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its judgment in 2122994 Ontario Inc. v. Read More

Franchisees’ right to associate: The...

Posted by | 10 November 2017

This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily on November 8, 2017. Click here to view the published article. Read More

Ontario Court of Appeal Continues to...

Posted by | 20 October 2017

Author: Evan Ivkovic, J.D., Law Works P.C. Read More

View All

What’s New

Article in The Lawyer’s Dail...

We are pleased to announce that The Lawyer’s Daily published an article by Ben Hanuka on November 8, 2017, titled “Franchisees’ right to associate: The good, the bad... Read More

Article in The Lawyer’s Dail...

We are pleased to announce that The Lawyer’s Daily published an article by Ben Hanuka on October 11, 2017, titled “The Reality of Franchise Rescission Summary Judgment... Read More

Ben Hanuka gives expert commen...

We are pleased to announce that the Globe and Mail sought our firm’s expert opinion about the intensifying fight in the Tim Horton’s franchise. Read More

View All

Request Information

Please Fill out this form to request information

*By filling out this form you agree to be contacted by Law Works to receive emails pertaining to requested information. You can unsubscribe at any time, simply contact us or reply "unsubscribe" to our emails.

Law Works Lawyers | 855-978-5293|tel:855-978-5293 | 80 Kincort Street, 2nd Floor, Toronto, ON M6M 5G1 | https://www.lawworks.ca

Please select the DIAMOND and click the SUBMIT button

rolling
 Please wait...