Leading Canadian
FRANCHISE & BUSINESS LAW FIRM

Sovereignty (Houston Stakes)

Full Case Name: Sovereignty Investment Holdings, Inc. v. 9127-6907 Quebec Inc. (2008)

This is an influential Ontario court decision under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, on the issue of what constitutes a materially deficient disclosure document.

The franchisee purchased a large restaurant in the Vaughan-Mills Shopping Centre that is located in Vaughan. The franchisor was a Quebec franchise startup.

About a year after purchasing the restaurant, the franchisee was forced to close it down as a result of mounting losses.

The disclosure document did not contain key required components under the Act. The franchisee brought a court action to cancel (rescind) the franchise purchase and receive compensation.

The court held for the first time that a disclosure document is inoperable and is not considered a “disclosure document” under the Act if it fails to contain any one of the following fundamental components: (i) a signed franchisor’s certificate, (ii) financial statements, (iii) if earning projections are included, the required supporting information about, and (iv) that the disclosure document contain all required information and documents in one document, delivered to a prospective franchisee at one time.

The decision was made by a senior judge of the Ontario court, sitting on the specialized Commercial List, Mr. Justice Wilton-Siegel.

This case has played a pivotal role in shaping some fundamental aspects of Ontario franchise disclosure law under the Act with respect to the main requirements of a disclosure document under the Act.

In addition, this was the first Ontario case that held a successor franchisor – a purchasing franchisor that acquired the rights to the franchise system from the original franchisor – was liable to a franchisee for the original franchisor’s rescission obligations.

Back

Franchise Law Blog

Ontario Court Dismisses Summary...

Posted by | 28 July 2020

By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works  Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works  In 1781807 Ontario Limited v. Read More

Ontario Court Dismisses Franchisor’s...

Posted by | 28 July 2020

By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works  Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works  In Tiny Hoppers Corp. v. 2402074 Ontario Inc. Read More

Upcoming Amendments to the Arthur...

Posted by | 28 July 2020

This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on July 22, 2020, under the same title. Read More

View All

What’s New

Franchise Issue in Focus July ...

We are pleased to introduce Franchise Issue in Focus, a monthly edition of our Franchise Law Newsletter. Read More

Franchise Issue in Focus June ...

We are pleased to introduce Franchise Issue in Focus, a monthly edition of our Franchise Law Newsletter. Read More

Franchise Law Newsletter May 2...

Released today, the May edition of our Franchise Law Newsletter examines two recent court decisions. Read More

View All