REGISTER FOR OUR NEXT LIVE WEBINAR

Leading Canadian
FRANCHISE & BUSINESS LAW FIRM

Sovereignty (Houston Stakes)

Full Case Name: Sovereignty Investment Holdings, Inc. v. 9127-6907 Quebec Inc. (2008)

This is an influential Ontario court decision under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, on the issue of what constitutes a materially deficient disclosure document.

The franchisee purchased a large restaurant in the Vaughan-Mills Shopping Centre that is located in Vaughan. The franchisor was a Quebec franchise startup.

About a year after purchasing the restaurant, the franchisee was forced to close it down as a result of mounting losses.

The disclosure document did not contain key required components under the Act. The franchisee brought a court action to cancel (rescind) the franchise purchase and receive compensation.

The court held for the first time that a disclosure document is inoperable and is not considered a “disclosure document” under the Act if it fails to contain any one of the following fundamental components: (i) a signed franchisor’s certificate, (ii) financial statements, (iii) if earning projections are included, the required supporting information about, and (iv) that the disclosure document contain all required information and documents in one document, delivered to a prospective franchisee at one time.

The decision was made by a senior judge of the Ontario court, sitting on the specialized Commercial List, Mr. Justice Wilton-Siegel.

This case has played a pivotal role in shaping some fundamental aspects of Ontario franchise disclosure law under the Act with respect to the main requirements of a disclosure document under the Act.

In addition, this was the first Ontario case that held a successor franchisor – a purchasing franchisor that acquired the rights to the franchise system from the original franchisor – was liable to a franchisee for the original franchisor’s rescission obligations.

Back

Franchise Law Blog

Scandalous allegations of former...

Posted by | 21 October 2021

By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. v. Read More

Terminated franchisee’s vape store...

Posted by | 21 October 2021

By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In Unicity Holdings Ltd. v. Great British Vape Co. Read More

Ontario court grants injunction...

Posted by | 30 September 2021

By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In 9925350 Canada Inc. v. Kevito Ltd. Read More

View All

What’s New

Terminated franchisee’s vape...

By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In Unicity Holdings Ltd. v. Great British Vape Co. Read More

Ontario court grants judgment ...

By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In a May 31, 2021, decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Coffee Time Donuts v 2197938 Ontario Inc. Read More

Scandalous allegations of form...

By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. v. Read More

View All