By: Mandana Niknejad, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 2611707 Ontario Inc. v. Freshly Squeezed Franchise, a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario on June 3, 2022, the court dismissed an appeal by the franchisor, Freshly Squeezed, from the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, which granted rescission under subsection 6(2) of the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, based on several material deficiencies in the disclosure document.
By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In 9925350 Canada Inc. v. Kevito Ltd.
By: Anthony Pugh Editor: Ben Hanuka In a May 31, 2021, decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Coffee Time Donuts v 2197938 Ontario...
By: Ben Hanuka, Law Works This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily as a two-part series on May 25 and 27, 2021.
All provincial franchise statutes impose a mutual obligation on the parties to a franchise agreement to perform and enforce their contractual rights...
By Ben Hanuka, Law Works This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily as a two-part series on January 22 and 26, 2021.
This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily as a two-part series on September 23 and 24, 2020.
There are two types of marketing obligations in most franchise agreements: contributions to a marketing fund run by the franchisor and direct...
This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily as a two-part series on August 20, 2020 and August 24, 2020.
*Law Works is a Canadian law firm. It publishes a newsletter to inform subscribers about franchise disputes. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the ‘unsubscribe’ link in our emails.
