This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on December 11, 2019, under the same title. Author: Ben Hanuka, Law Works Here are highlights from this year’s franchise-related decisions across Canada. (Ontario - Court of Appeal – Breach of Franchise Agreement/Evidence) The Court of Appeal for Ontario upheld a decision granting a motion for summary judgment.
Author: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. Overview In Westeinde (FNP) Inc. v. RE/MAX Core Realty Inc.
Authors: Ben Hanuka and Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. 2018 was a busy year in Canadian franchise disputes.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Second Cup Ltd. c. 8702934 Canada Inc.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In 9107-5382 Québec inc. c. Voyage Vasco inc.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Azmoon Trading Inc. v. Caffe Demetre Franchising Corp.
The Ontario Court of Appeal released an interesting decision recently in a case involving the enforceability of a non-competition covenant in a...
Procedural Background In the case of 244674 Ontario Inc. v. Home Instead, Inc.
In the 2014 split decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Rhebergen v. Creston Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
*Law Works is a Canadian law firm. It publishes a newsletter to inform subscribers about franchise disputes. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the ‘unsubscribe’ link in our emails.
