Article Content

If you are a lawyer with franchise clients, a Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) is bound to land on your desk at some point. An FDD is a legal requirement in provinces across Canada where franchises are regulated (Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, New Brunswick, and PEI).  In Ontario, the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 and its Regulation (General Ontario Regulation 581/00), define what proper disclosure entails. The other provinces’ laws follow a similar framework.

Franchisors must provide a valid FDD to prospective franchisees 14 days before they sign any agreement or pay any money. It must contain all essential components required by franchise legislation – every material fact, every key detail, fully disclosed.  Get this wrong, and the consequences are severe.

This guide highlights what to focus on when reviewing an FDD, with references to our Disclosure Document Primer Series for deeper insights.

Franchise rescission rights in Ontario 

An FDD isn’t just a formality – if it’s missing critical elements under Ontario’s Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 (or similar laws elsewhere), it’s not considered a “Disclosure Document”. A deficient FDD is as good as no FDD at all.  

If a franchisee received an invalid FDD – or none – they can rescind the entire deal – the purchase, the lease, and all related investments and losses.

The Act offers two rescission paths: 

  • Section 6(1): A flawed FDD is delivered, and the franchisee issues a Notice of Rescission within 60 days of receipt. 
  • Section 6(2): No FDD is provided, giving the franchisee two years from signing the Franchise Agreement to rescind. 

For a full breakdown of these scenarios and related claims, see Franchise rescissions in Ontario: a disclosure document primer.

Does it include the essentials? 

A valid FDD must deliver all required information in a single document at one time. Fragmented or non-compliant disclosure opens the door to rescission claims with significant financial fallout. Our eBook The five top franchise disclosure deficiencies for lawyers, explores Ontario cases where key components were absent or flawed. 

Here is what’s non-negotiable: 

1. A signed and dated franchisor’s certificate  

2. Complete financial statements 

The financial statements are required to be audited or prepared on a “review engagement basis”, i.e., in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles that meet or exceed the review and reporting standards applicable to review engagements set out in the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Handbook.

3. All agreements that franchisees must sign 

4. All material facts

5. Additional required information  

Conclusion: Avoid the pitfalls 

For lawyers advising franchise clients, mastering FDD analysis is critical. A non-compliant FDD can unravel deals and spark costly disputes. You need to scrutinize every element, identify what’s material, and flag risks – such as sharing projections or agreements outside the FDD that could trigger rescission. 

A thorough, accurate FDD isn’t just compliance – it’s the foundation for solid franchise relationships. Refer to our Disclosure Document Primer Series for comprehensive guidance. It’s effort well spent. 

 

The information contained in this article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should not act on this information without seeking professional legal advice from a lawyer experienced in this area. The content in this article may not reflect the most current legal developments, and the application of law can vary in different provinces and territories. As such, the information in this article is not guaranteed to be complete, correct, or up to date. The author and the publisher of this article disclaim all liability for any actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this site. 

The Law Works website offers a vast number of resources by way of blog articles, courses and webinars about franchise, commercial and real estate disputes. Subscribe to our newsletters to stay up to date on the latest information from us. 

Law Works offers complimentary initial 15-20 min telephone consultations, which you can book online. 

Table of Contents

Interested In Taking a Professional Development Course?

Ben Hanuka
JD, LLM, CS (Civ Lit), FCIArb, of the Ontario and BC Bars

Highlights:

  • JD, LLM (Osgoode '96, '15), C.S. in Civ Lit (LSO), Fellow of CIArb, member of the Bars of Ontario ('98) and BC ('17)
  • Principal of Law Works PC (Ontario)/LC (British Columbia)
  • Acted as counsel in many leading franchise court decisions in Ontario over the past twenty-five years, including appellate decisions.
  • Provided expert opinions in and outside Ontario
  • Presented at and chaired numerous franchise and civil litigation CPD programs for over 20 years
  • Chair of OBA Professional Development (2005-2006) - overseeing all PD programs
  • Chair of Civil Litigation Section, OBA (2004-2005)

Notable Cases:

Mendoza v. Active Tire & Auto Inc., 2017 ONCA 471

1159607 Ontario v. Country Style Food Services, 2012 ONSC 881 (SCJ)

1518628 Ontario Inc. v. Tutor Time Learning Centres LLC (2006), 150 A.C.W.S. (3d) 93 (SCJ, Commercial List)

Bekah v. Three for One Pizza (2003), 67 O.R. (3d) 305, [2003] O.J. No. 4002 (SCJ)