Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In 1680960 Ontario Inc. v. Print Three Franchising Corporation, a May 14, 2018, decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, a judge dismissed a franchisee’s motion for summary judgment in a franchise rescission case where there were many critical facts in dispute. These conflicts in the evidence meant there were genuine issues for trial. Key facts Carmen and Sorin Burchesin, principals of the future franchisee, 1680960 Ontario Inc.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In Richmond Hill (Town) v.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In M.Y. Sundae Inc. v.
Authors: Ben Hanuka and Anthony Pugh, Law Works P.C. In PQ Licensing S.A. v. LPQ Central Canada Inc.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In 10313033 Canada Inc. v. 2418973 Ontario Inc.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In 8518076 Canada Inc. v.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In franchise resales, i.e.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In Giroux et al. v.