Franchise Law & Business Disputes Blog
  • Franchise Law Blog

Board Acted Unreasonably by Not Following the Only Reasonable Interpretation of ...

Posted on May 21 2018

Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In Richmond Hill (Town) v. Elginbay Corporation, a January 29, 2018, decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, the court agreed with the Ontario Divisional Court that the Ontario Municipal Board’s decision to impose a cap in the Official Plan of Richmond Hill on the amount of land required to be conveyed for parkland was unreasonable.


To receive blog updates by email please subscribe to our newsletter.


*Law Works is a Canadian legal services provider whose newsletter is designed to keep you current on relevant information to their services. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our emails.

Recent Posts

Most Popular

Categories

Tags

Feeds