Author: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In Taylor v. Blenz The Canadian Coffee, a June 7, 2019, decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the court held that the proposed amendments to the pleadings of the franchisees were not statute barred under British Columbia’s Limitation Act because the factual foundation of the proposed amendments were based on existing factual allegations in the pleadings. Three franchisees sued Blenz Canada and its affiliates for alleged breach of the franchise agreements.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily on September 20, 2019, under the title, “Start your engines:...
Author: Anthony Pugh and Sarah McMahon, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In 2462192 Ontario Ltd. v.
Author: Anthony Pugh and Sarah McMahon, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In the case of 2352392 Ontario Inc. et al. v.
Authors: Ben Hanuka and Anthony Pugh, Law Works P.C.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In 2355305 Ontario Inc. v. Savannah Wells Holdings Inc.
Authors: Ben Hanuka and Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. 2018 was a busy year in Canadian franchise disputes.
Author: Robert Jones, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works P.C. In Fyfe v.
By Ben Hanuka This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily on August 9, 2018.
*Law Works is a Canadian law firm. It publishes a newsletter to inform subscribers about franchise and arbitration disputes. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the ‘unsubscribe’ link in our emails.
