Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In 1680960 Ontario Inc. v. Print Three Franchising Corporation, a May 14, 2018, decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, a judge dismissed a franchisee’s motion for summary judgment in a franchise rescission case where there were many critical facts in dispute. These conflicts in the evidence meant there were genuine issues for trial. Key facts Carmen and Sorin Burchesin, principals of the future franchisee, 1680960 Ontario Inc.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In franchise resales, i.e.
Author: Anthony Pugh, Student-at-Law, Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In Giroux et al. v.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily February 8, 2018. Click here to view the published article.
By Ben Hanuka This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily on January 31, 2018.
By Ben Hanuka This article, written by Ben Hanuka, was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily on December 6, 2017.
Author: Evan Ivkovic, J.D., Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In Hepburn v AlarmForce Industries Inc.
On July 4, 2017, the Court of Appeal for Ontario released a decision in Trillium Motor World Ltd. v.
This article, written by Ben Hanuka, originally appears in the May 31, 2017, issue of The Lawyer's Daily. Click here to view the full article.