By: Alex Sinenko, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 2611707 Ontario Inc., et al. v. Freshly Squeezed Franchise Juice Corporation, et al., a March 26, 2021, decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the court granted an application by the franchisee for rescission under subsection 6(2) of the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, based on multiple material deficiencies in the franchisor’s disclosure document. Facts On January 8, 2018, the franchisee entered into a franchise agreement with the franchisor.
By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 1777453 Alberta Ltd. v. Got Mold Disaster Recovery Services Inc.
By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 2212886 Ontario Inc. v. Obsidian Group Inc.
By: Alex Sinenko, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 2619506 Ontario Inc. v 2082100 Ontario Inc.
If a franchisor fails to deliver a disclosure document as required under franchise legislation, a franchisee is entitled to cancel (legally...
This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily as a two-part series on September 23 and 24, 2020.
This article was originally published in The Lawyer’s Daily as a two-part series on August 20, 2020 and August 24, 2020.
By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In 1781807 Ontario Limited v.
By: Anthony Pugh, Law Works Editor: Ben Hanuka, Law Works In Tiny Hoppers Corp. v. 2402074 Ontario Inc.
*Law Works is a Canadian law firm. It publishes a newsletter to inform subscribers about franchise disputes. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the ‘unsubscribe’ link in our emails.
